Jumping on the Bandwagon
/“Properly trained, a man can be dog’s best friend.”—Corey Ford
By now we’ve all become aware of new terminology suggested for words and phrases in the English language that have existed for generations. Some of these recommendations exist for cultural and political reasons. Colleges and universities have been at the front edge of this movement, even lowering grades on the papers of non-compliant students. Regardless of your feelings about these recommended changes, it’s obvious that considerable thought and deliberation has been invested in the process. These politically correct wordsmiths apparently spend quite a bit of time on this.
Based on a lifetime living with dogs, I’ve decided to join the parade and jump on the bandwagon of those tinkering with terminology. Specifically, I take issue with the term “dog owner”. People own cars, lawnmowers, stocks and bonds. Closets, cupboards and garages are filled with things we own and use when required or desired. Dogs just don’t fit in the category of “owned” items.
Do pictures of a new vacuum cleaner ever show up as someone’s screen saver or on their Instagram page? I doubt it. Can you imagine making this statement with great affection in a melodic, high-pitched voice? “You’re a good chain saw. Thank you for doing such a nice job cutting all that wood.” No way! Similarly, we don’t ask our sneakers with wide eyes, a clap of our hands and over-emphasized excitement, “Would you like to go for a walk?” Of course not. That’s because we own these things, and we have no personal relationship with them. Owning something implies that the item serves a specific purpose when needed or required, and on our terms. You may own a home, but sorry, not the dog living in it with you.
Dogs, if we think about it, own their humans. How else can you explain getting up at all hours of the night to take a puppy or an older dog outside to “do her business”. Or throwing balls, sticks or other items into the water to be retrieved by a soaking wet canine who must be toweled off before going inside. Or, sometimes showing more care for an aging pet than you do for your spouse? Most people who live with dogs would do almost anything for their beloved companions. We buy the cheapest gasoline for our cars yet purchase the most expensive dog food for our pups. Clearly the term “dog owner” is ripe for revision. We don’t own them, it’s the other way around.
I’m jumping on the bandwagon. From now on, the new terminology to replace dog owner should be dog-owned. It makes sense, don’t you think? The term more accurately reflects the reality of a human/canine relationship. The next time someone asks if I have a pet, my answer will be, “Yes, I am dog-owned.” Blind Bessie will nod her head in agreement, and I would not have it any other way.
BE LIKE BESSIE!